Blue‑Green Deployments vs Rolling Deployments
Concept
You maintain two identical environments:
- Blue = current production
- Green = new version
You deploy updates to the Green environment and then switch traffic from Blue → Green instantly (usually via load balancer update or DNS switch).
How It Works
- Deploy new version to Green.
- Run all tests in isolation.
- Flip traffic from Blue → Green.
- Keep Blue as backup for instant rollback.
Pros
✅ Zero downtime deployment
✅ Instant rollback (switch back to Blue)
✅ Perfect for risky features or major changes
✅ Safe testing in a production‑like environment
Cons
❌ Requires double the infrastructure
❌ May increase cost
❌ Database schema changes can be tricky
❌ Not ideal for frequent small updates
Best for
- Critical applications where downtime = loss
- Major version upgrades
- Teams needing strong rollback safety
- Traditional servers, ECS, EKS, EC2, RDS-backed apps
Rolling Deployment
Concept
You update your application gradually, replacing old instances with new ones one batch at a time.
Example:
10 servers → update 2 at a time → until all run the new version.
How It Works
- Start with a mix of old & new versions.
- Gradually update instances over time.
- Traffic is served from both until rollout completes.
Pros
✅ No need for duplicate environments
✅ Lower cost than Blue‑Green
✅ Good for microservices and container workloads
✅ Ideal for frequent, small updates
✅ Supported natively by Kubernetes & AWS ECS
Cons
❌ More complex rollback (need to roll back batches)
❌ Temporary version mismatch (old vs new running together)
❌ Errors may be introduced before detection
❌ Testing is harder because environments are mixed
Best for
- Continuous deployments (CD)
- Microservices / Kubernetes / ECS
- Apps that handle version mismatches
- Frequent incremental updates
When to Choose What?
✔ Choose Blue‑Green if:
- You want maximum safety
- You can afford duplicate infrastructure
- You’re deploying major features or breaking changes
- You need instant rollback
✔ Choose Rolling if:
- You deploy often
- You want a cost-effective strategy
- Your system tolerates mixed versions
- You use Kubernetes, ECS, or microservices
Final Takeaway
Blue‑Green = Safer, costlier, instant rollback
Rolling = Cheaper, gradual, ideal for continuous deployments
Both are powerful — the right strategy depends on your team’s risk tolerance, architecture, and release frequency.
Replies
No replies yet.
Please login to post a reply.